The Role of oil in shaping Foreign Policies: A comparative study of OPEC and Non-OPEC States

Downloads

Download the Article:

Authors

  • Mohammed Kabeer Garba (Author) PhD Scholar, ECOWAS Parliament, Abuja, Nigeria
  • Yusuf Wada Muhammad (Author) Department of Social Sciences, College of Administrative Studies and social Sciences, Kaduna Polytechnic, Kaduna, Nigeria
https://doi.org/10.55559/mankind.v2i3.16

Keywords:

Foreign Policy, Non-OPEC States, Energy Diplomacy, Geopolitics, Sustainable Development, Climate Change, Renewable Energy

Abstract

The paper presented in this paper compares the role of oil in influencing the foreign policies of the OPEC and Non-OPEC countries. It discusses the uses of oil as a strategic resource by nations to gain economic and geopolitical advantages using examples of Saudi Arabia, Iran, Venezuela (OPEC) and Russia (Non-OPEC) and the U.S and Norway. The results indicate that OPEC countries tend to use oil as an economic tool and ideological instrument, whereas non-OPEC nations assemble the energy exportation with military strengths and sustainability initiatives. The research is based on the realist theory, which perceives oil as a major tool of achieving national interest and power. It also puts emphasis on institutions such as OPEC in the energy policy coordination and the effects of climate change and renewable on the future energy relations globally. The paper ends with the suggestions of the policies to improve energy security, sustainable development and promote global collaboration to handle the dynamic energy environment.

References

Amuzegar, J. (2001). Managing the Oil Wealth: OPEC's Windfalls and Pitfalls. I.B. Tauris.

Bryman, A. (2012). Social Research Methods. Oxford University Press.

Colgan, J. D. (2014). The Emperor Has No Clothes: The Limits of OPEC in the Global Oil Market. International Organization, 68(3), 599-632.

Corrales, J., & Penfold, M. (2015). Dragon in the Tropics: Venezuela and the Legacy of Hugo Chávez. Brookings Institution Press.

Gause, F. G. (2015). Saudi Arabia in the New Middle East. Council on Foreign Relations.

George, A. L., & Bennett, A. (2005). Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences. MIT Press.

Goldman, M. I. (2008). Petrostate: Putin, Power, and the New Russia. Oxford University Press.

Henderson, S. (2016). The New Oil Order: Saudi Arabia and the Geopolitics of Energy. The Washington Institute.

International Energy Agency (IEA). (2021). World Energy Outlook 2021. OECD/IEA.

Keohane, R. O., & Nye, J. S. (1977). Power and Interdependence: World Politics in Transition. Little, Brown.

Klare, M. T. (2004). Blood and Oil: The Dangers and Consequences of America's Growing Dependency on Imported Petroleum. Metropolitan Books.

Mearsheimer, J. J. (2001). The Tragedy of Great Power Politics. W.W. Norton & Company.

OPEC. (2022). Annual Statistical Bulletin. OPEC Secretariat.

Orttung, R., & Overland, I. (2011). Russia’s Role in the Global Energy Markets. Russian Analytical Digest.

Ryggvik, H. (2010). The Norwegian Oil Experience: A Toolbox for Managing Resources? Oslo: University of Oslo.

Stokes, D., & Raphael, S. (2010). Global Energy Security and American Hegemony. Johns Hopkins University Press.

Takeyh, R. (2009). Guardians of the Revolution: Iran and the World in the Age of the Ayatollahs. Oxford University Press.

Wendt, A. (1999). Social Theory of International Politics. Cambridge University Press.

Yergin, D. (1991). The Prize: The Epic Quest for Oil, Money, and Power. Simon & Schuster.

Yergin, D. (2020). The New Map: Energy, Climate, and the Clash of Nations. Penguin Press.

Yin, R. K. (2017). Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods. Sage Publications.

Published on:

26-10-2025

Also Available On

Note: Third-party indexing sometime takes time. Please wait one week or two for indexing. Validate this article's Schema Markup on Schema.org

How to Cite

Garba, M. K., & Muhammad, Y. W. (2025). The Role of oil in shaping Foreign Policies: A comparative study of OPEC and Non-OPEC States. Mankind: Adam to Me, 2(3), 27-31. https://doi.org/10.55559/mankind.v2i3.16

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.